AI readiness scorecard
A scoring worksheet for deciding whether a workflow is ready for autonomous or semi-autonomous execution.
Baciu.com service area
An adoption plan for moving AI services from launch to measurable usage, feedback, training, and continuous improvement.
We start with the business process, the users, and the failure modes. Then we choose the smallest architecture that can be measured, reviewed, and operated safely.
Explore pageA good AI system leaves traces: source evidence, evaluation history, cost and latency telemetry, and clear escalation rules for the cases that should not be automated.
Explore pageSubject expansion
A scoring worksheet for deciding whether a workflow is ready for autonomous or semi-autonomous execution.
Explore pageA control matrix that maps AI capability scope to data access, tool authority, approvals, logging, and incident response.
Explore pageA starter evaluation set for testing source grounding, citation behavior, permission boundaries, and answer quality.
Explore pageA production runbook for model routing, fallback, cost controls, latency, tracing, degraded mode, and release review.
Explore pageA board-ready outline for connecting AI initiatives to outcomes, risk gates, build sequence, and decision cadence.
Explore pageA tabletop exercise for AI services that can produce wrong answers, unsafe actions, policy violations, or outage cascades.
Explore pageA practical operating model for assigning ownership across AI product, platform, risk, operations, and business teams.
Explore pageA structured intake template for deciding whether a process should become an assistant workflow, agent workflow, or deterministic automation.
Explore pageUse this document as the starting point for a workshop, operating review, or delivery handoff.
Resource library
Use these outlines as starting points for assessments, runbooks, governance reviews, and executive planning.
A scoring worksheet for deciding whether a workflow is ready for autonomous or semi-autonomous execution.
A control matrix that maps AI capability scope to data access, tool authority, approvals, logging, and incident response.
A starter evaluation set for testing source grounding, citation behavior, permission boundaries, and answer quality.
Delivery atlas
Filter, compare, and jump into detailed pages for AI architecture, execution, and governance.
Implementation library
A finance model for attributing AI runtime cost by workflow, department, customer segment, provider, and outcome.
A communications plan for AI incidents covering internal escalation, customer updates, regulatory notice, and postmortems.
A practical operating model for assigning ownership across AI product, platform, risk, operations, and business teams.
A review outline for documenting AI data handling, retention, subprocessors, residency, and customer control requirements.
A tabletop exercise for AI services that can produce wrong answers, unsafe actions, policy violations, or outage cascades.
A scoring worksheet for deciding whether a workflow is ready for autonomous or semi-autonomous execution.
A service-level objective template for AI latency, quality, cost, availability, escalation, and degraded-mode behavior.
A risk register for tracking AI authority, reversibility, sensitive data exposure, failure modes, mitigations, and owners.
A dashboard outline for monitoring provider mix, cost drift, latency budgets, fallback rates, and quality regressions.
A source inventory for mapping owners, freshness, permissions, quality issues, retention rules, and ingestion priority.
A release-gate template that connects evaluation results, known regressions, approval decisions, rollback, and launch notes.
A board-ready outline for connecting AI initiatives to outcomes, risk gates, build sequence, and decision cadence.
A steering-committee packet for connecting AI portfolio decisions to milestones, risks, spend, and operating outcomes.
A control matrix that maps AI capability scope to data access, tool authority, approvals, logging, and incident response.
A policy template for defining which AI decisions require approval, who approves them, and what evidence is required.
A decision tree for routing between models, cached answers, degraded mode, escalation, and temporary shutdown.
A production runbook for model routing, fallback, cost controls, latency, tracing, degraded mode, and release review.
A workbook for translating organizational roles into retrieval, tool-use, approval, logging, and audit permissions.
A handoff checklist for moving AI systems from delivery into operated services with owners, runbooks, controls, and evidence.
A release review checklist for prompt, policy, model, and tool changes before they reach production users.
A scenario catalog for testing prompt injection, unsafe tool use, data leakage, policy bypass, and recovery behavior.
An audit worksheet for checking cited answers against source text, permissions, freshness, and reviewer corrections.
A starter evaluation set for testing source grounding, citation behavior, permission boundaries, and answer quality.
An ownership map for knowledge sources, refresh cadence, permission rules, source quality, and escalation contacts.
A technical specification for AI-callable tools covering schema, permissions, idempotency, retries, and audit trails.
A review worksheet for validating AI-callable tool scopes, sensitive actions, audit trails, and approval thresholds.
A scorecard for comparing model and platform vendors across quality, latency, cost, security, support, and lock-in risk.
A calculator outline for estimating automation value from cycle time, error rate, labor mix, risk reduction, and adoption.
A structured intake template for deciding whether a process should become an assistant workflow, agent workflow, or deterministic automation.
Downloadable implementation outlines for teams planning, evaluating, governing, and operating production AI systems.
A services practice for organizations that need AI systems designed, evaluated, shipped, and operated with accountability.
Use-case patterns for access requests, entitlement review, policy checks, approval packets, and identity-workflow support.
Permission models for deciding what agents may read, draft, recommend, approve, execute, and escalate.
Release patterns for moving agents from prototype to monitored, supported, measurable production services.
A structured assessment for deciding whether a workflow is ready for autonomous or semi-autonomous execution.
A controlled environment for designing, testing, and managing reusable agents before they reach production.
Execution lab
Tune delivery tempo, autonomy, and risk profile to inspect recommended phases, dependencies, and control gates.
Recommended phases
No retrieval without source discipline
Trust is a product feature
Action with accountability
Every release earns trust
Control where the work happens
Client teams can operate independently
Capability radar
Select an operating perspective and horizon to inspect relevant tracks, signals, and linked decision pages.
Priority tracks
AI spend tied to operating value
Open pageStrategy with an implementation path
Open pageGovernance in the delivery loop
Open pageDelivery designed for durable ownership
Open pageControl where the work happens
Open pageExecution blueprint
Each area is delivered through explicit definition, measurable validation, and operating governance that client teams can inherit.
Define explicit goals, boundaries, and stop conditions before implementation.
Explore pageRun iterative plan-execute-verify loops before delivering outcomes.
Explore pageKeep human approval for sensitive or irreversible actions.
Explore pageOperating checklist
A clear system map covering models, tools, data, workflows, users, and failure modes.
Explore pageTask sets, regression checks, and release criteria for measurable AI behavior.
Explore pageHuman approval, access, logging, data-boundary, and incident-response rules.
Explore pageDocumentation and ownership so the client can operate the system after launch.
Explore pageStart with repetitive, reversible workflows where outcomes and failure boundaries can be measured.
Use eval sets, adversarial scenarios, and explicit go/no-go criteria tied to business impact.
With authority boundaries, confidence thresholds, escalation packets, and complete execution traces.
Treat model and prompt changes as releases: test, review, approve, and roll out with rollback paths.
Coverage map
A scoring worksheet for deciding whether a workflow is ready for autonomous or semi-autonomous execution.
Explore pageA control matrix that maps AI capability scope to data access, tool authority, approvals, logging, and incident response.
Explore pageA starter evaluation set for testing source grounding, citation behavior, permission boundaries, and answer quality.
Explore pageA production runbook for model routing, fallback, cost controls, latency, tracing, degraded mode, and release review.
Explore pageRelevant pages
Downloadable implementation outlines for teams planning, evaluating, governing, and operating production AI systems.
Explore pageA scoring worksheet for deciding whether a workflow is ready for autonomous or semi-autonomous execution.
Explore pageA control matrix that maps AI capability scope to data access, tool authority, approvals, logging, and incident response.
Explore page